PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYL vs. HYLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYL vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYL achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.65% return.


SHYL

1D
0.15%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*

HYLB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYL vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.30%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-0.67%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.65%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYL and HYLB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.92

The correlation between SHYL and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYL vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYL vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYLHYLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.00

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

12.90

+2.07

SHYL vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYL and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYLHYLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.84

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.55

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Drawdowns

SHYL vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYL drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYL and HYLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYLHYLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-22.91%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-2.27%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

-4.51%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

-15.54%

+5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-2.43%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.53%

-0.13%

Volatility

SHYL vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) is 0.86%, while Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that SHYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYLHYLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.19%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

2.92%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

3.70%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

7.47%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

8.18%

-1.49%

SHYL vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHYL vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than HYLB's 6.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.48%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.93%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SHYL and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYLB has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to SHYL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYL dropped -19.26% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, SHYL leads with 4.91% vs 4.06% for HYLB. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHYL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHYL has performed better with a 4.91% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHYL.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 6.48% for HYLB.

SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHYL and 0.15% for HYLB.

SHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYL and HYLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer