PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYG.L is traded in GBP, while XZHE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XZHE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


SHYG.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
0.73%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
3.56%

XZHE.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.59%7.69%0.97%9.31%8.81%
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.63%11.10%1.12%7.71%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG.L and XZHE.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022

0.81

The correlation between SHYG.L and XZHE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG.L
SHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XZHE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYG.LXZHE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYG.LXZHE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYG.LXZHE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

Volatility

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYG.LXZHE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XZHE.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG.L vs. XZHE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHYG.L nor XZHE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%2.75%6.24%5.39%3.58%3.13%3.66%3.86%3.65%3.74%3.83%4.55%
XZHE.L
Xtrackers ESG EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG.L and XZHE.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZHE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZHE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYG.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYG.L and 0.25% for XZHE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG.L and XZHE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer