PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHV vs. EWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHV vs. EWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than EWW's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SHV has underperformed EWW with an annualized return of 2.23%, while EWW has yielded a comparatively higher 7.89% annualized return.


SHV

1D
0.03%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
2.23%

EWW

1D
1.46%
1M
1.63%
YTD
13.18%
6M
13.14%
1Y
33.34%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHV vs. EWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.53%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%2.36%1.72%0.67%
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
13.18%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SHV and EWW is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHV vs. EWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHV vs. EWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHVEWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+18.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+147.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

53.77

1.27

+52.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

431.38

2.32

+429.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,419.80

8.25

+2,411.55

SHV vs. EWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHV Sharpe Ratio is 19.49, which is higher than the EWW Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHV and EWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHV vs. EWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum EWW drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and EWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHVEWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-64.94%

+64.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-13.98%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.03%

-31.17%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.39%

-31.17%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

-53.62%

+53.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.40%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-18.51%

+18.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

3.93%

-3.93%

Volatility

SHV vs. EWW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.04%, while iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHVEWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

6.96%

-6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

18.46%

-18.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

21.76%

-21.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.29%

22.58%

-22.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.28%

25.39%

-25.11%

SHV vs. EWW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EWW's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHV vs. EWW - Dividend Comparison

SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than EWW's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
3.07%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHV and EWW have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to SHV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs EWW's -64.94%.

On 10-year performance, EWW leads with 7.89% vs 2.23% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWW has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWW.

SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.07% for EWW.

SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while EWW is Latin America Equities. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.49% for EWW.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHV and EWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer