SHUS vs. WTMF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Hedge Fund funds. SHUS is actively managed, while WTMF is passively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 16.72% vs 18.91% for WTMF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

SHUS vs. WTMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than WTMF's 6.68% return.

SHUS

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTMF

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: 9.72%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 3.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHUS vs. WTMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	9.37%	10.89%	-2.65%
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund	6.68%	12.17%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and WTMF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.44

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. WTMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 55
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 55

WTMF

WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 80
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHUS vs. WTMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHUS	WTMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.10	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.84	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.40	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	4.71	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.56	19.91	-11.34

SHUS vs. WTMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the WTMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and WTMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. WTMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum WTMF drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and WTMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	WTMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-30.79%	+16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-4.04%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-2.17%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-17.64%	+15.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	0.95%	+1.01%

Volatility

SHUS vs. WTMF - Volatility Comparison

Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	WTMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	3.17%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	7.33%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.18%	9.06%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	9.53%	+3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.59%	8.11%	+4.48%

SHUS vs. WTMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SHUS and WTMF have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

SHUS vs. WTMF - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than WTMF's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	1.26%	1.37%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund	2.85%	3.04%	3.57%	4.74%	5.29%	14.71%	0.47%	1.63%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and WTMF in my portfolio?

SHUS and WTMF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHUS or WTMF?

WTMF has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to SHUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs WTMF's -30.79%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or WTMF?

On 1-year performance, WTMF leads with 18.91% vs 16.72% for SHUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or WTMF?

Over the 1-year period, WTMF has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or WTMF?

SHUS and WTMF have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or WTMF?

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.26% for SHUS.

What is the main difference between SHUS and WTMF?

They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and WisdomTree.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.