PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHSSX vs. JNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHSSX achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than JNGLX's -3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SHSSX has underperformed JNGLX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while JNGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


SHSSX

1D
-1.67%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-5.86%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
9.37%

JNGLX

1D
-2.62%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHSSX
Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional
-5.37%16.13%4.00%3.86%-5.72%12.17%19.54%25.63%8.24%25.02%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
-3.59%24.84%3.60%7.51%-2.69%6.78%25.66%29.20%4.17%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SHSSX and JNGLX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.93

The correlation between SHSSX and JNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHSSX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHSSX
SHSSX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SHSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGLX
JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHSSXJNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.65

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

8.47

-5.08

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHSSX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHSSXJNGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.73

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.45

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.57

+0.12

Drawdowns

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHSSX drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, smaller than the maximum JNGLX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHSSX and JNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHSSXJNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.40%

-59.00%

+23.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-9.68%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-21.17%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-22.21%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

-27.37%

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-6.49%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-17.65%

+11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.02%

+0.89%

Volatility

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) is 4.16%, while Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that SHSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHSSXJNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.69%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

10.95%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

14.85%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

15.85%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

17.38%

-0.84%

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHSSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHSSX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

SHSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.47%, more than JNGLX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
4.73%4.56%5.84%4.26%0.25%9.85%7.80%6.23%13.32%0.89%0.30%8.81%
SHSSX
Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional
10.47%9.90%8.68%3.82%7.20%8.96%4.18%3.87%8.44%3.59%2.33%12.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SHSSX and JNGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNGLX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SHSSX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHSSX dropped -35.40% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHSSX and JNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer