PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHSAX vs. MMUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHSAX achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than MMUFX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SHSAX has outperformed MMUFX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while MMUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


SHSAX

1D
1.37%
1M
1.76%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
10.05%

MMUFX

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.39%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHSAX
BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio
-1.61%15.85%3.73%3.59%-5.94%11.88%19.44%25.27%7.93%24.74%
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
7.13%14.32%11.38%-2.28%0.35%13.86%6.04%24.91%0.85%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SHSAX and MMUFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between SHSAX and MMUFX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHSAX vs. MMUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHSAX
SHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

MMUFX
MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHSAXMMUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.96

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

4.82

-0.43

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the MMUFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHSAX and MMUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHSAX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum MMUFX drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHSAX and MMUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHSAXMMUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-56.03%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-8.75%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-17.72%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.99%

-21.64%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

-35.82%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-5.09%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-8.75%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.56%

+0.53%

Volatility

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio (SHSAX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHSAXMMUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.00%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

11.61%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

14.37%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

15.83%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.64%

-0.07%

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHSAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MMUFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHSAX vs. MMUFX - Dividend Comparison

SHSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than MMUFX's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
3.57%3.83%3.72%5.82%8.68%5.61%5.80%6.85%4.29%2.67%3.72%9.09%
SHSAX
BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio
10.81%10.63%9.18%3.84%7.44%9.20%4.34%3.89%8.56%3.53%2.43%12.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHSAX and MMUFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHSAX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to MMUFX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHSAX dropped -35.49% vs MMUFX's -56.03%.

SHSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHSAX and MMUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer