SHRY vs. BUFH
SHRY (First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHRY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHRY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
SHRY vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRY achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
SHRY
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRY vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 4.24% | 1.36% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRY and BUFH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRY vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
SHRY
BUFH
SHRY vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHRY | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHRY | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 2.91 | -2.31 |
Drawdowns
SHRY vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRY drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRY and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRY | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -1.53% | -35.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -0.05% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -0.18% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | — | — |
Volatility
SHRY vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRY | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 2.37% | +8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 2.37% | +13.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 2.37% | +15.81% |
SHRY vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRY vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
SHRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.69% | 1.73% | 1.76% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRY and BUFH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHRY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHRY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
SHRY has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
SHRY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SHRY and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for SHRY and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer