SHPU vs. NUGT
SHPU (Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). SHPU is actively managed, while NUGT is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHPU charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
SHPU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPU achieves a -63.07% return, which is significantly lower than NUGT's -35.52% return.
SHPU
- 1D
- -4.90%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- -63.07%
- 6M
- -66.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -29.37%
- YTD
- -35.52%
- 6M
- -41.56%
- 1Y
- 59.76%
- 3Y*
- 52.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- -12.40%
SHPU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHPU Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF | -63.07% | 8.74% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -35.52% | 113.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPU and NUGT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
SHPU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUGT
SHPU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF (SHPU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPU drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPU and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -99.97% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.28% | -99.85% | +28.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.89% | -91.53% | +52.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.10% | — |
Volatility
SHPU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.61% | 94.54% | +15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.61% | 73.03% | +36.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.61% | 87.98% | +21.63% |
SHPU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPU has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
SHPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.18%, more than NUGT's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.61% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
SHPU Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF | 56.18% | 20.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHPU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHPU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
SHPU has the higher dividend yield at 56.18%, compared with 0.61% for NUGT.
SHPU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for SHPU and 1.13% for NUGT.
Find the right allocation for SHPU and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer