SHPAX vs. SIBPX
SHPAX (Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund) and SIBPX (Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SHPAX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Saratoga, while SIBPX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, SHPAX returned 4.70%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for SIBPX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHPAX charges 2.90%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for SIBPX.
Performance
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPAX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than SIBPX's -0.85% return.
SHPAX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
SIBPX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPAX Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund | -0.71% | 17.43% | 0.26% | -0.36% | 1.93% | 16.71% | 3.52% | 27.67% | -5.30% | 0.49% |
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | -0.85% | 6.50% | 0.78% | 2.90% | -2.51% | -1.73% | 3.34% | 3.84% | -0.72% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPAX and SIBPX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, SHPAX and SIBPX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPAX vs. SIBPX — Risk / Return Rank
SHPAX
SIBPX
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund (SHPAX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPAX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.79 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 2.15 | +2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPAX drawdown since its inception was -69.50%, which is greater than SIBPX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPAX and SIBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPAX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.50% | -5.57% | -63.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -3.30% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.32% | -4.28% | -12.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.32% | -4.74% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -2.18% | -4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.88% | -1.71% | -26.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 1.21% | +2.52% |
Volatility
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Volatility Comparison
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund (SHPAX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) at 1.25%. This indicates that SHPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPAX | SIBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 1.25% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 2.77% | +7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 3.87% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 3.39% | +10.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 2.76% | +13.86% |
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPAX has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SIBPX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPAX vs. SIBPX - Dividend Comparison
SHPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than SIBPX's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPAX Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund | 3.69% | 3.66% | 1.35% | 5.38% | 6.34% | 3.76% | 13.82% | 13.24% | 22.00% | 17.98% | 12.52% | 10.70% |
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio | 2.04% | 2.24% | 2.31% | 1.54% | 0.14% | 1.39% | 0.58% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPAX and SIBPX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHPAX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SIBPX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPAX dropped -69.50% vs SIBPX's -5.57%.
SHPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPAX and SIBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer