PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHPAX vs. SLCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund (SHPAX) and Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than SLCGX's -1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SHPAX has underperformed SLCGX with an annualized return of 6.90%, while SLCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


SHPAX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.61%
6M
6.99%
YTD
8.70%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
6.90%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

SLCGX

1D
2.93%
1M
-1.51%
6M
2.45%
YTD
-1.83%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
18.65%
ALL TIME*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHPAX
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund
8.70%17.43%0.26%-0.36%1.93%16.71%3.52%27.67%-5.30%11.78%
SLCGX
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio
-1.83%22.74%40.67%38.79%-28.77%32.60%28.67%51.18%-0.28%30.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SHPAX and SLCGX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between SHPAX and SLCGX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHPAX vs. SLCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHPAX
SHPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SHPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SHPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SLCGX
SLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund (SHPAX) and Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHPAXSLCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.07

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.35

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

1.02

+6.28

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the SLCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHPAX and SLCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPAX drawdown since its inception was -69.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SLCGX drawdown of -71.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPAX and SLCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHPAXSLCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.50%

-71.04%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-18.18%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.32%

-24.17%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.32%

-31.13%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.05%

-31.16%

+3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-5.74%

+4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-22.81%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

6.18%

-2.53%

Volatility

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund (SHPAX) is 5.55%, while Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that SHPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHPAXSLCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.86%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

14.32%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

18.17%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

21.92%

-7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

22.13%

-5.48%

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPAX has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SLCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHPAX vs. SLCGX - Dividend Comparison

SHPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than SLCGX's 14.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHPAX
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Fund
3.37%3.66%1.35%5.38%6.34%3.76%13.82%13.24%22.00%17.98%12.52%10.70%
SLCGX
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio
14.09%13.83%23.77%7.53%7.55%23.16%8.91%31.50%25.22%5.81%23.83%10.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHPAX and SLCGX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLCGX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to SHPAX (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPAX dropped -69.50% vs SLCGX's -71.04%.

SHPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHPAX and SLCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer