PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHOP vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHOP vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shopify Inc. (SHOP) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHOP achieves a -32.76% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SHOP has outperformed PWR with an annualized return of 43.59%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively lower 41.17% annualized return.


SHOP

1D
-2.02%
1M
7.94%
YTD
-32.76%
6M
-34.08%
1Y
2.75%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
-2.79%
10Y*
43.59%

PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-9.27%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHOP vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHOP
Shopify Inc.
-32.76%51.39%36.50%124.43%-74.80%21.68%184.71%187.17%37.08%135.60%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SHOP and PWR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2015

0.27

The correlation between SHOP and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHOP:

$141.08B

PWR:

$107.64B

EPS

SHOP:

$1.02

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

SHOP:

106.25

PWR:

97.08

PEG Ratio

SHOP:

0.20

PWR:

4.81

PS Ratio

SHOP:

15.39

PWR:

3.58

PB Ratio

SHOP:

11.29

PWR:

11.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHOP:

$9.20B

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHOP:

$5.93B

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHOP:

$1.60B

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHOP vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHOP
SHOP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SHOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHOP vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shopify Inc. (SHOP) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHOPPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.44

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

5.73

-5.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

18.09

-18.13

SHOP vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHOP Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHOP and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHOP vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHOP drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOP and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHOPPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-97.07%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.71%

-17.11%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.71%

-33.89%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.82%

-33.89%

-50.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.82%

-45.53%

-39.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.53%

-9.87%

-29.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.23%

-46.84%

+18.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.27%

5.41%

+16.86%

Volatility

SHOP vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Shopify Inc. (SHOP) has a higher volatility of 15.38% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 13.07%. This indicates that SHOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHOPPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.38%

13.07%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.41%

30.74%

+12.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.03%

37.12%

+19.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.55%

35.79%

+29.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.07%

33.78%

+25.29%

Dividends

SHOP vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

SHOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%
SHOP
Shopify Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SHOP vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shopify Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B202220232024202520260
7.87B
(SHOP) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SHOP and PWR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHOP has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to PWR (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOP dropped -84.82% vs PWR's -97.07%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHOP and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer