SHNY vs. DZZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) and DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. Over the past 3 years, SHNY returned 49.33%/yr vs -10.43%/yr for DZZ. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. SHNY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DZZ.

Performance

SHNY vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -34.20% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -52.47% return.

SHNY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: -27.06%
• YTD: -34.20%
• 6M: -42.91%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 49.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DZZ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -12.68%
• YTD: -52.47%
• 6M: -48.59%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: -10.43%
• 5Y*: -8.56%
• 10Y*: -10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHNY vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	-34.20%	214.54%	50.30%	10.98%
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	-52.47%	132.78%	-35.06%	-5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SHNY and DZZ is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023	-0.47

Return for Risk

SHNY vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHNY

SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

DZZ

DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHNY vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHNY	DZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.03	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	1.43	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.19	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	-0.07	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	-0.10	+0.59

SHNY vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHNY and DZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHNY vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -65.54%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and DZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHNY	DZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.54%	-96.64%	+31.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.54%	-81.05%	+15.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.54%	-81.05%	+15.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.05%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.38%	-95.55%	+30.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.65%	-82.32%	+66.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.98%	56.22%	-27.24%

Volatility

SHNY vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) has a higher volatility of 24.50% compared to DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) at 15.04%. This indicates that SHNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHNY	DZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.50%	15.04%	+9.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.44%	60.07%	+14.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.62%	169.84%	-88.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.25%	83.80%	-24.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.25%	64.06%	-4.81%

SHNY vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHNY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHNY vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHNY nor DZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHNY and DZZ in my portfolio?

SHNY and DZZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHNY or DZZ?

SHNY has higher volatility (24.50%) compared to DZZ (15.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -65.54% vs DZZ's -96.64%.

Which ETF is better, SHNY or DZZ?

On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 49.33% vs -10.43% for DZZ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DZZ has been the lower-risk option at 15.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHNY or DZZ?

Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 49.33% return vs -10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHNY or DZZ?

DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SHNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHNY or DZZ?

SHNY and DZZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SHNY and DZZ?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SHNY and 0.75% for DZZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.