PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHNY vs. DZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHNY vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -14.45% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -48.31% return.


SHNY

1D
-3.20%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-14.45%
6M
-10.44%
1Y
49.39%
3Y*
59.66%
5Y*
10Y*

DZZ

1D
1.45%
1M
-16.65%
YTD
-48.31%
6M
-41.62%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
-6.90%
5Y*
-4.82%
10Y*
-10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHNY vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SHNY
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
-14.45%214.54%50.30%12.52%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes
-48.31%132.78%-35.06%-6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SHNY and DZZ is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023

-0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHNY vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHNY
SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DZZ
DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHNY vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHNYDZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.14

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

0.21

+1.72

SHNY vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHNY and DZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHNYDZZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.07

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

-0.23

+1.25

Drawdowns

SHNY vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and DZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHNYDZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.99%

-96.64%

+41.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.99%

-80.84%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.99%

-80.84%

+25.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.99%

-95.16%

+40.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-82.30%

+67.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.66%

53.19%

-27.53%

Volatility

SHNY vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) is 16.40%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 30.21%. This indicates that SHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHNYDZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.40%

30.21%

-13.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.87%

59.65%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.80%

169.45%

-90.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.36%

83.63%

-25.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.36%

64.05%

-5.69%

SHNY vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHNY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHNY vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHNY nor DZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SHNY and DZZ have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DZZ has higher volatility (30.21%) compared to SHNY (16.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -54.99% vs DZZ's -96.64%.

On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 59.66% vs -6.90% for DZZ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SHNY has been the lower-risk option at 16.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 59.66% return vs -6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SHNY.

SHNY and DZZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SHNY and 0.75% for DZZ.

SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHNY and DZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer