SHNY vs. CXRN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. Over the past year, SHNY returned 14.03% vs -27.23% for CXRN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SHNY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHNY achieves a -34.20% return, which is significantly lower than CXRN's -21.39% return.

SHNY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: -27.06%
• YTD: -34.20%
• 6M: -42.91%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 49.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CXRN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -21.84%
• YTD: -21.39%
• 6M: -23.62%
• 1Y: -27.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHNY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	-34.20%	214.54%	-7.50%
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-21.39%	-25.68%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SHNY and CXRN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

SHNY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHNY

SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 2
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHNY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHNY	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.76	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	-0.92	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.89	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	-0.94	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	-2.21	+2.70

SHNY vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHNY and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHNY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHNY drawdown since its inception was -65.54%, which is greater than CXRN's maximum drawdown of -51.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHNY and CXRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHNY	CXRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.54%	-51.11%	-14.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.54%	-28.97%	-36.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.38%	-51.11%	-14.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.65%	-30.67%	+15.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.98%	12.34%	+16.64%

Volatility

SHNY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) has a higher volatility of 24.50% compared to Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) at 9.67%. This indicates that SHNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHNY	CXRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.50%	9.67%	+14.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.44%	27.05%	+47.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.62%	36.39%	+45.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.25%	36.73%	+22.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.25%	36.73%	+22.52%

SHNY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SHNY and CXRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SHNY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

SHNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.87%	3.30%	0.13%
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHNY and CXRN in my portfolio?

SHNY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHNY or CXRN?

SHNY has higher volatility (24.50%) compared to CXRN (9.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHNY dropped -65.54% vs CXRN's -51.11%.

Which ETF is better, SHNY or CXRN?

On 1-year performance, SHNY leads with 14.03% vs -27.23% for CXRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, CXRN has been the lower-risk option at 9.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHNY or CXRN?

Over the 1-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 14.03% return vs -27.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHNY or CXRN?

SHNY and CXRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHNY or CXRN?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for SHNY.

What is the main difference between SHNY and CXRN?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Teucrium.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.