PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLS vs. ENLAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) and ENEL Societa per Azioni (ENLAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLS achieves a 28.71% return, which is significantly higher than ENLAY's 10.55% return.


SHLS

1D
4.99%
1M
10.39%
YTD
28.71%
6M
17.38%
1Y
119.68%
3Y*
-23.12%
5Y*
-19.06%
10Y*

ENLAY

1D
-1.15%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
10.55%
6M
12.61%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
28.71%53.71%-64.41%-37.01%1.52%-22.36%
ENLAY
ENEL Societa per Azioni
10.55%56.31%2.11%47.93%-27.98%-20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLS and ENLAY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHLS:

$1.83B

ENLAY:

$115.68B

EPS

SHLS:

$0.20

ENLAY:

€0.42

PE Ratio

SHLS:

54.89

ENLAY:

23.24

PEG Ratio

SHLS:

0.04

ENLAY:

1.01

PS Ratio

SHLS:

3.44

ENLAY:

1.31

PB Ratio

SHLS:

3.05

ENLAY:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHLS:

$535.53M

ENLAY:

€72.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHLS:

$179.38M

ENLAY:

€24.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHLS:

$62.07M

ENLAY:

€23.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLS vs. ENLAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLS
SHLS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ENLAY
ENLAY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ENLAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENLAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENLAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ENLAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENLAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) and ENEL Societa per Azioni (ENLAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLSENLAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.35

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

6.70

-1.08

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the ENLAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLS and ENLAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLS drawdown since its inception was -93.00%, which is greater than ENLAY's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLS and ENLAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLSENLAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.00%

-63.03%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.37%

-12.76%

-34.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.56%

-17.48%

-72.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.50%

-56.97%

-35.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.77%

-6.67%

-66.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.33%

-20.58%

-38.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.38%

4.46%

+16.92%

Volatility

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Volatility Comparison

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) has a higher volatility of 31.03% compared to ENEL Societa per Azioni (ENLAY) at 5.72%. This indicates that SHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENLAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLSENLAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.03%

5.72%

+25.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.77%

18.53%

+48.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.71%

21.70%

+66.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.95%

24.79%

+54.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.66%

26.22%

+52.44%

Dividends

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Dividend Comparison

SHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENLAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENLAY
ENEL Societa per Azioni
5.01%5.04%6.53%5.76%7.96%4.25%3.62%2.25%2.69%3.29%6.03%2.07%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. and ENEL Societa per Azioni. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
140.56M
20.93B
(SHLS) Total Revenue
(ENLAY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SHLS values in USD, ENLAY values in EUR

SHLS vs. ENLAY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. and ENEL Societa per Azioni over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
29.2%
19.4%
Portfolio components
SHLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.01M and revenue of 140.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.2%.

ENLAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported a gross profit of 4.05B and revenue of 20.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

SHLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.72M and revenue of 140.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

ENLAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported an operating income of 4.05B and revenue of 20.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

SHLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. reported a net income of -297.00K and revenue of 140.56M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.

ENLAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 20.93B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHLS and ENLAY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLS has higher volatility (31.03%) compared to ENLAY (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLS dropped -93.00% vs ENLAY's -63.03%.

ENLAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLS and ENLAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer