ENLAY vs. BEP
ENLAY (ENEL Societa per Azioni) and BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — ENLAY in Utilities - Diversified, BEP in Utilities - Renewable. Over the past 10 years, ENLAY returned 16.38%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for BEP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENLAY vs. BEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENLAY achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than BEP's 35.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ENLAY has outperformed BEP with an annualized return of 16.38%, while BEP has yielded a comparatively lower 14.49% annualized return.
ENLAY
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
BEP
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 35.56%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 50.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
ENLAY vs. BEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENLAY ENEL Societa per Azioni | 10.55% | 56.31% | 2.11% | 47.93% | -27.98% | -18.92% | 34.75% | 38.89% | -2.41% | 46.09% |
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 35.56% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 90.75% | -20.95% | 24.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENLAY and BEP is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
ENLAY:
$115.68B
BEP:
$10.84B
ENLAY:
€0.42
BEP:
$0.66
ENLAY:
23.24
BEP:
54.06
ENLAY:
1.01
BEP:
0.39
ENLAY:
1.31
BEP:
1.63
ENLAY:
2.86
BEP:
2.93
ENLAY:
€72.93B
BEP:
$6.37B
ENLAY:
€24.84B
BEP:
$2.19B
ENLAY:
€23.83B
BEP:
$4.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENLAY vs. BEP — Risk / Return Rank
ENLAY
BEP
ENLAY vs. BEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ENEL Societa per Azioni (ENLAY) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENLAY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.55 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 8.07 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENLAY vs. BEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENLAY drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than BEP's maximum drawdown of -53.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENLAY and BEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENLAY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -53.85% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -14.25% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.48% | -31.78% | +14.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.97% | -47.46% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -53.85% | -7.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -5.47% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.58% | -13.61% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 6.26% | -1.80% |
Volatility
ENLAY vs. BEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ENEL Societa per Azioni (ENLAY) is 5.72%, while Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that ENLAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENLAY | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 7.82% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.53% | 19.61% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 28.85% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 31.01% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 30.02% | -3.80% |
Dividends
ENLAY vs. BEP - Dividend Comparison
ENLAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than BEP's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.28% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
ENLAY ENEL Societa per Azioni | 5.01% | 5.04% | 6.53% | 5.76% | 7.96% | 4.25% | 3.62% | 2.25% | 2.69% | 3.29% | 6.03% | 2.07% |
Financials
ENLAY vs. BEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ENEL Societa per Azioni and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENLAY vs. BEP - Profitability Comparison
ENLAY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported a gross profit of 4.05B and revenue of 20.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
BEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 210.05M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.
ENLAY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported an operating income of 4.05B and revenue of 20.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
BEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 138.06M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
ENLAY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ENEL Societa per Azioni reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 20.93B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
BEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a net income of -113.41M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENLAY and BEP have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEP has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to ENLAY (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENLAY dropped -63.03% vs BEP's -53.85%.
BEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENLAY and BEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer