SHLD vs. URA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SHLD returned 9.71% vs 61.26% for URA. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHLD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

SHLD vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 17.93% return.

SHLD

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: -2.28%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	-2.28%	74.16%	35.03%	12.89%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-0.58%	14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD and URA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.41

The correlation between SHLD and URA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHLD vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHLD	URA
Industrials	88.2%	21.9%
Technology	11.8%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	5.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	57.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	9.4%

Return for Risk

SHLD vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD

SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 15
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHLD	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.23	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	1.86	-1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.22	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	2.17	-1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	4.58	-3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHLD vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHLD	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	1.23	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	-0.05	+2.05

Drawdowns

SHLD vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHLD	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.10%	-93.54%	+73.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.10%	-28.43%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.85%	-42.81%	+23.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-75.01%	+71.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.51%	13.40%	-5.89%

Volatility

SHLD vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is 7.81%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 15.94%. This indicates that SHLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHLD	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	15.94%	-8.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.35%	38.29%	-18.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.05%	50.19%	-26.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.13%	43.62%	-22.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.13%	37.73%	-16.60%

SHLD vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHLD vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than URA's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	0.56%	0.55%	0.53%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHLD and URA in my portfolio?

SHLD and URA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHLD or URA?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to SHLD (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLD dropped -20.10% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, SHLD or URA?

On 1-year performance, URA leads with 61.26% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHLD or URA?

Over the 1-year period, URA has performed better with a 61.26% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHLD or URA?

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHLD or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

What is the main difference between SHLD and URA?

SHLD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHLD and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.