PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHG vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHG vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (SHG) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHG achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than NVS's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SHG has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 10.16%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


SHG

1D
2.62%
1M
4.73%
YTD
25.49%
6M
26.79%
1Y
55.63%
3Y*
39.87%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
10.16%

NVS

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.40%
6M
18.98%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHG vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHG
Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.
25.49%68.28%12.80%15.25%-4.61%5.27%-21.83%7.27%-23.51%23.27%
NVS
Novartis AG
14.40%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SHG and NVS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2003

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHG:

$32.47B

NVS:

$293.28B

EPS

SHG:

₩10.58K

NVS:

$6.99

PE Ratio

SHG:

9.67

NVS:

21.90

PEG Ratio

SHG:

1.13

NVS:

1.48

PS Ratio

SHG:

1.42

NVS:

5.29

PB Ratio

SHG:

0.84

NVS:

7.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHG:

₩34.80T

NVS:

$56.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHG:

₩16.62T

NVS:

$42.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHG:

₩8.32T

NVS:

$22.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHG vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHG
SHG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHG vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (SHG) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHGNVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.43

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

5.88

+2.64

SHG vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHG and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHG vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHG drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHG and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHGNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.02%

-42.10%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.03%

-12.65%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.19%

-19.95%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.39%

-20.42%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.50%

-26.03%

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-6.46%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-10.92%

-22.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

5.23%

+1.32%

Volatility

SHG vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (SHG) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 7.18%. This indicates that SHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHGNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

7.18%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.12%

14.96%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.55%

21.02%

+9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.99%

18.89%

+11.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.34%

19.64%

+10.70%

Dividends

SHG vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

SHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than NVS's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVS
Novartis AG
3.12%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%
SHG
Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.
0.61%2.24%5.96%3.87%5.54%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.35%3.10%

Financials

SHG vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T20222023202420252026
8.73T
13.52B
(SHG) Total Revenue
(NVS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SHG values in KRW, NVS values in USD

SHG vs. NVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. and Novartis AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
48.0%
74.4%
Portfolio components
SHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 4.19T and revenue of 8.73T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.0%.

NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

SHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.29T and revenue of 8.73T, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

SHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. reported a net income of 1.62T and revenue of 8.73T, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHG and NVS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHG has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to NVS (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHG dropped -82.02% vs NVS's -42.10%.

SHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHG and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer