PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHFSW vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHFSW vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SHF Holdings Inc (SHFSW) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHFSW achieves a -34.83% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.06% return.


SHFSW

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-34.83%
6M
-46.30%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
-0.93%
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
-2.05%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
10.06%
6M
9.32%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
12.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHFSW vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHFSW
SHF Holdings Inc
-34.83%-11.57%-48.85%33.44%-86.64%-14.56%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
10.06%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SHFSW and VT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2021

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHFSW vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHFSW
SHFSW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SHFSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHFSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHFSW Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SHFSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHFSW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHFSW vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SHF Holdings Inc (SHFSW) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHFSWVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

2.67

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

11.57

-11.20

SHFSW vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHFSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHFSW and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHFSW vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHFSW drawdown since its inception was -97.54%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHFSW and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHFSWVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.54%

-50.27%

-47.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.67%

-9.67%

-46.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.41%

-16.51%

-66.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.81%

-2.80%

-93.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.81%

-7.00%

-74.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.96%

2.23%

+27.73%

Volatility

SHFSW vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

SHF Holdings Inc (SHFSW) has a higher volatility of 51.62% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.65%. This indicates that SHFSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHFSWVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

51.62%

5.65%

+45.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.20%

11.32%

+80.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

223.56%

13.58%

+209.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

230.39%

16.19%

+214.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

230.39%

17.20%

+213.19%

Dividends

SHFSW vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

SHFSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHFSW
SHF Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHFSW and VT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHFSW has higher volatility (51.62%) compared to VT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHFSW dropped -97.54% vs VT's -50.27%.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHFSW and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer