SHE vs. QCLR
SHE (SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHE returned 24.28%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for QCLR. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.
Performance
SHE vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.40% return.
SHE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHE vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 19.56% | 15.50% | 23.35% | 22.37% | -21.73% | -1.82% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.40% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHE and QCLR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SHE and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHE vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHE
QCLR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SHE
QCLR
Financial Services
SHE
QCLR
Communication Services
SHE
QCLR
Industrials
SHE
QCLR
Consumer Cyclical
SHE
QCLR
Healthcare
SHE
QCLR
Consumer Defensive
SHE
QCLR
Energy
SHE
QCLR
Utilities
SHE
QCLR
Real Estate
SHE
QCLR
Basic Materials
SHE
QCLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHE vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
SHE
QCLR
SHE vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 1.17 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 1.60 | +1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.12 | +2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | 4.02 | +10.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.17 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.67 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SHE vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and QCLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -21.77% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -10.22% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.07% | -13.58% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.89% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -6.20% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.84% | -0.74% |
Volatility
SHE vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.45%. This indicates that SHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHE | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 0.45% | +4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 7.24% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 9.82% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 12.42% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 12.42% | +5.62% |
SHE vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHE vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than QCLR's 14.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.68% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 0.99% | 1.24% | 1.91% | 7.39% | 5.37% | 6.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHE and QCLR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHE has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs QCLR's -21.77%.
On 3-year performance, SHE leads with 24.28% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, SHE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHE has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 1.06% for SHE.
SHE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. SHE tracks SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.60% for QCLR.
SHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHE and QCLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer