PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHE vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.


SHE

1D
-0.58%
1M
10.08%
YTD
19.56%
6M
21.08%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.83%

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHE
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF
19.56%15.50%23.35%22.37%-21.73%15.17%17.93%23.63%-6.80%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SHE and GLDM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.09

The correlation between SHE and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHE vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHE
GLDM

Technology

38.0%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

9.5%

-

Industrials

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
100.0%

Technology

SHE
38.0%
GLDM

-

Financial Services

SHE
11.9%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

SHE
9.5%
GLDM

-

Industrials

SHE
8.9%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SHE
8.9%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

SHE
8.7%
GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

SHE
4.6%
GLDM

-

Energy

SHE
3.4%
GLDM

-

Utilities

SHE
2.2%
GLDM

-

Real Estate

SHE
1.9%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

SHE
1.9%
GLDM
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHE
SHE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHEGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

1.24

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

1.63

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.70

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.98

4.23

+10.76

SHE vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHE Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHE and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHEGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.24

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.04

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.02

-0.28

Drawdowns

SHE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHEGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.80%

-21.63%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-19.14%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-19.14%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-20.92%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-17.65%

+17.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.22%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

7.69%

-5.59%

Volatility

SHE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) is 5.06%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHEGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.47%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

22.99%

-12.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

26.39%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.91%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

16.85%

+1.19%

SHE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHE
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF
1.06%1.18%1.14%1.37%1.54%0.99%1.24%1.91%7.39%5.37%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SHE (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 10.89% for SHE. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHE.

SHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SHE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GLDM is Gold. SHE tracks SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.10% for GLDM.

SHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHE and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer