PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAK vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHAK vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAK achieves a -34.26% return, which is significantly lower than CRM's -28.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SHAK has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of 3.70%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.74% annualized return.


SHAK

1D
-3.91%
1M
-44.77%
YTD
-34.26%
6M
-33.40%
1Y
-57.97%
3Y*
-8.10%
5Y*
-9.78%
10Y*
3.70%

CRM

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.94%
YTD
-28.57%
6M
-23.41%
1Y
-27.74%
3Y*
-3.00%
5Y*
-4.21%
10Y*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAK vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
-34.26%-37.47%75.12%78.47%-42.45%-14.89%42.32%31.15%5.14%20.70%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-28.57%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAK and CRM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2015

0.31

The correlation between SHAK and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHAK:

$2.15B

CRM:

$164.40B

EPS

SHAK:

$0.99

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

SHAK:

53.72

CRM:

21.97

PEG Ratio

SHAK:

0.75

CRM:

0.05

PS Ratio

SHAK:

1.48

CRM:

4.12

PB Ratio

SHAK:

4.09

CRM:

4.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHAK:

$1.49B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHAK:

$111.61M

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHAK:

$179.77M

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAK vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAK
SHAK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SHAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAK vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHAKCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.89

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.71

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.71

-1.37

-0.34

SHAK vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAK Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAK and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHAKCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.09

-0.73

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

-0.11

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.25

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.45

-0.43

Drawdowns

SHAK vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAK drawdown since its inception was -70.89%, roughly equal to the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAK and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAKCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.89%

-70.50%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.43%

-39.46%

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.43%

-54.70%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.77%

-58.62%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.89%

-58.62%

-12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.43%

-48.17%

-14.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-16.11%

-24.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.82%

20.28%

+13.54%

Volatility

SHAK vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) has a higher volatility of 36.20% compared to Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) at 17.33%. This indicates that SHAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAKCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.20%

17.33%

+18.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.65%

31.96%

+15.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.12%

37.88%

+15.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.59%

37.00%

+14.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.42%

35.33%

+15.09%

Dividends

SHAK vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

SHAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.89%0.63%0.48%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SHAK vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shake Shack Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
366.74M
11.13B
(SHAK) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SHAK vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shake Shack Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
76.9%
Portfolio components
SHAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shake Shack Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 366.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

SHAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shake Shack Inc. reported an operating income of -2.63M and revenue of 366.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.7%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

SHAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shake Shack Inc. reported a net income of -290.00K and revenue of 366.74M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHAK and CRM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHAK has higher volatility (36.20%) compared to CRM (17.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAK dropped -70.89% vs CRM's -70.50%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAK and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer