PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAG vs. FLDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAG vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAG achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FLDB's 1.36% return.


SHAG

1D
0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

FLDB

1D
0.08%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAG vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SHAG and FLDB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAG vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAG
SHAG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SHAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDB
FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAG vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHAGFLDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.11

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

25.15

-22.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

93.64

-83.95

SHAG vs. FLDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the FLDB Sharpe Ratio of 4.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAG and FLDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHAGFLDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

4.68

-2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

3.59

-2.75

Drawdowns

SHAG vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAG drawdown since its inception was -9.62%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAG and FLDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAGFLDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-0.49%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-0.17%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.05%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.05%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.04%

+0.35%

Volatility

SHAG vs. FLDB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) at 0.34%. This indicates that SHAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAGFLDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.34%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

0.62%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

0.90%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

1.31%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

1.31%

+1.27%

SHAG vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAG has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHAG vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

SHAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FLDB's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLDB
Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF
4.45%4.72%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
4.28%4.33%4.49%3.04%1.38%0.92%2.33%2.71%2.56%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAG and FLDB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHAG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to FLDB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAG dropped -9.62% vs FLDB's -0.49%.

On 1-year performance, FLDB leads with 4.20% vs 3.73% for SHAG. On fees, SHAG is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FLDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLDB has performed better with a 4.20% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHAG is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FLDB.

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.28% for SHAG.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SHAG and 0.20% for FLDB.

FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAG and FLDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer