PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAG vs. BBSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAG vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAG achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than BBSB's 0.55% return.


SHAG

1D
0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

BBSB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAG vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SHAG and BBSB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023

0.87

The correlation between SHAG and BBSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAG vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAG
SHAG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SHAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSB
BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAG vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHAGBBSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.89

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

16.07

-6.38

SHAG vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAG and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHAGBBSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.64

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.36

-1.53

Drawdowns

SHAG vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAG drawdown since its inception was -9.62%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAG and BBSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAGBBSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-1.57%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-0.86%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.38%

-0.96%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.18%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.31%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.21%

+0.18%

Volatility

SHAG vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) at 0.36%. This indicates that SHAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAGBBSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.36%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

0.85%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.27%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

1.66%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

1.66%

+0.92%

SHAG vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAG has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHAG vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

SHAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than BBSB's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF
3.81%3.69%4.84%3.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
4.28%4.33%4.49%3.04%1.38%0.92%2.33%2.71%2.56%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAG and BBSB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHAG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to BBSB (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAG dropped -9.62% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

On 3-year performance, SHAG leads with 4.72% vs 4.15% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHAG has performed better with a 4.72% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SHAG.

SHAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.81% for BBSB.

SHAG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBSB is Government Bonds. SHAG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index, while BBSB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SHAG and 0.04% for BBSB.

BBSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAG and BBSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer