SH vs. SSO
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.47%/yr vs 23.19%/yr for SSO. Their -0.99 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SH charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SH vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -12.47%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.19% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- -10.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- -12.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $271.72M | $244.09M | $301.56M | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
SH vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.65% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SSO is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.99 |
The correlation between SH and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SH vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
SSO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SH
SSO
Basic Materials
SH
-
SSO
Communication Services
SH
-
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
SSO
Energy
SH
-
SSO
Healthcare
SH
-
SSO
Industrials
SH
-
SSO
Real Estate
SH
-
SSO
Technology
SH
-
SSO
Utilities
SH
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SSO
SH vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.23 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.81 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 7.25 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -84.67% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -18.17% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -35.21% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -46.73% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | -59.34% | -15.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.54% | -4.07% | -90.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.93% | -19.45% | -48.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 4.54% | +4.49% |
Volatility
SH vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 3.51%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 7.07% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 20.14% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 25.63% | -12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 33.88% | -16.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 35.91% | -17.89% |
SH vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than SSO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.19% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and SSO have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to SH (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.19% vs -12.47% for SH. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.19% return vs -12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.67% for SSO.
SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SH and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer