SH vs. SARK
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SH is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SH returned -13.02%/yr vs -30.74%/yr for SARK. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SH vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -6.78% return.
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -2.37% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SARK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SH and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SARK
SH vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SH | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.83 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | -1.11 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SH | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | -0.95 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.24 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SH vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -81.07% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.28% | -40.75% | +22.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -74.42% | +35.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -79.42% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.73% | -46.46% | -21.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 30.47% | -20.58% |
Volatility
SH vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 2.84%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 9.13% | -6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 25.05% | -16.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 35.91% | -24.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 56.24% | -39.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 56.24% | -38.23% |
SH vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SARK's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and SARK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 3-year performance, SH leads with -13.02% vs -30.74% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SH has performed better with a -13.02% return vs -30.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.02% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.75% for SARK.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.94 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer