SH vs. PLTD
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - SH tracks the S&P 500 (-100%) while PLTD tracks the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SH returned -17.23% vs -22.19% for PLTD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PLTD.
Performance
SH vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 13.23% return.
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
PLTD
- 1D
- 6.63%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- -22.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | 3.71% |
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares | 13.23% | -70.53% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and PLTD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SH and PLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank
SH
PLTD
SH vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.96 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.50 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | -0.74 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | -0.43 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.86 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SH vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than PLTD's maximum drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and PLTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -77.34% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.28% | -44.79% | +26.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -71.01% | -23.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.73% | -59.43% | -8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 30.14% | -20.25% |
Volatility
SH vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 2.84%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 18.68% | -15.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 38.02% | -29.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 51.79% | -39.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 63.73% | -46.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 63.73% | -45.72% |
SH vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than PLTD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares | 3.26% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and PLTD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTD has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs PLTD's -77.34%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -17.23% vs -22.19% for PLTD. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -22.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PLTD.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.26% for PLTD.
SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%), while PLTD tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.98% for PLTD.
PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and PLTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer