SH vs. MSFT
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.90%/yr vs 23.85%/yr for MSFT. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SH vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -22.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -12.90%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.85% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- -14.55%
- 3Y*
- -11.90%
- 5Y*
- -8.40%
- 10Y*
- -12.90%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -22.85%
- 1Y
- -22.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.85%
SH vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -5.55% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -22.33% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and MSFT is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.69 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SH and MSFT has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.69 to -0.46, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
SH
MSFT
SH vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.66 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | -1.32 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -69.38% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.42% | -33.91% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -33.91% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -37.15% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | -37.15% | -38.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.48% | -30.58% | -63.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.78% | -21.79% | -45.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 17.08% | -7.46% |
Volatility
SH vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 4.80%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 11.34% | -6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 22.94% | -13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 26.02% | -13.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 26.79% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 27.09% | -9.06% |
Dividends
SH vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than MSFT's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.95% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.39% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and MSFT have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to SH (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer