PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGWS.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGWS.L is traded in GBP, while VRPS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRPS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGWS.L achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than VRPS.L's 2.32% return.


SGWS.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.67%
6M
7.19%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

VRPS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.08%
6M
0.95%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
10.87%12.73%13.86%24.27%-20.28%28.51%7.96%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.32%-1.25%12.75%3.81%1.00%4.61%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SGWS.L and VRPS.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGWS.L
SGWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SGWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SGWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VRPS.L
VRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGWS.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGWS.LVRPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.06

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

2.89

+5.60

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGWS.L and VRPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGWS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.65%, smaller than the maximum VRPS.L drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGWS.L and VRPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGWS.LVRPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.65%

-27.14%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-4.75%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-9.37%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.65%

-15.84%

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-2.17%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-4.63%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.74%

+0.49%

Volatility

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L) at 1.77%. This indicates that SGWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGWS.LVRPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

1.77%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

5.23%

+5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

6.86%

+6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

8.74%

+6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

12.29%

+2.91%

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGWS.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than VRPS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGWS.L vs. VRPS.L - Dividend Comparison

SGWS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than VRPS.L's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SGWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.17%1.16%1.36%1.47%1.75%1.16%0.10%0.00%0.00%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.14%4.99%4.98%4.97%4.60%3.72%3.97%4.33%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGWS.L and VRPS.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGWS.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGWS.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRPS.L.

SGWS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VRPS.L is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. SGWS.L tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while VRPS.L tracks ICE Diversified Variable Rate Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for SGWS.L and 0.50% for VRPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGWS.L and VRPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer