SGVT vs. RMME

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and RMME (Rareview Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RMME.

Performance

SGVT vs. RMME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGVT having a 1.60% return and RMME slightly lower at 1.58%.

SGVT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMME

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. RMME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.60%	0.31%
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.58%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and RMME is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

SGVT vs. RMME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGVT

SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

RMME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. RMME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGVT	RMME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	17.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	82.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	29.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	137.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,101.11	—	—

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. RMME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum RMME drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and RMME.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGVT	RMME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.17%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGVT	RMME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22%	0.43%	-0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.22%	0.43%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.22%	0.43%	-0.21%

SGVT vs. RMME - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RMME's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGVT vs. RMME - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than RMME's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RMME Rareview Government Money Market ETF	1.60%	0.26%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.11%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGVT and RMME in my portfolio?

SGVT and RMME have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGVT or RMME?

On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGVT or RMME?

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RMME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGVT or RMME?

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.60% for RMME.

What is the main difference between SGVT and RMME?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.30% for RMME.