SGVT vs. MMK
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and MMK (State Street Prime Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for MMK.
Performance
SGVT vs. MMK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMK
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT vs. MMK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.43% |
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and MMK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. MMK — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
MMK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGVT vs. MMK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and State Street Prime Money Market ETF (MMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGVT | MMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 28.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 136.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,088.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. MMK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, which is greater than MMK's maximum drawdown of -0.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and MMK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | MMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.01% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. MMK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | MMK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 0.18% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 0.18% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 0.18% | +0.04% |
SGVT vs. MMK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MMK's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. MMK - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than MMK's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MMK State Street Prime Money Market ETF | 1.38% | 0.00% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.25% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and MMK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.38% for MMK.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.18% for MMK.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and MMK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer