SGVT vs. FDM
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FDM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Select Microcap Index. SGVT is actively managed, while FDM is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FDM.
Performance
SGVT vs. FDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDM's 7.48% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 27.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
SGVT vs. FDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 7.48% | 15.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and FDM is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. FDM — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
FDM
SGVT vs. FDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.57 | 0.34 | +18.23 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. FDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FDM drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -63.45% | +63.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.31% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -11.35% | +11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. FDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 18.90% | -18.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 21.39% | -21.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 23.36% | -23.16% |
SGVT vs. FDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FDM's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. FDM - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FDM's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and FDM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.28% for FDM.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FDM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.60% for FDM.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and FDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer