PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGSU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGSU.L is traded in GBP, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGSU.L achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's -6.52% return.


SGSU.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.41%
6M
1.46%
YTD
1.67%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*

IGLN.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
-7.84%
6M
-12.98%
YTD
-6.52%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SGSU.L
iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.67%5.12%5.16%4.29%-2.66%-0.43%2.44%0.80%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-6.52%53.18%28.34%7.77%11.79%-3.12%20.51%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SGSU.L and IGLN.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGSU.L
SGSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SGSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SGSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGSU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGSU.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.16

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.24

0.83

+8.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.95

2.06

+26.88

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGSU.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGSU.L drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGSU.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGSU.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-41.67%

+33.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-24.35%

+23.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.62%

-24.35%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.83%

-24.35%

+19.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-24.35%

+24.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-14.79%

+13.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

9.75%

-9.62%

Volatility

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGSU.L) is 0.48%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that SGSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGSU.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

7.51%

-7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

22.51%

-21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72%

25.62%

-23.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

17.25%

-15.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

15.78%

-12.76%

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGSU.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGSU.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

SGSU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGSU.L
iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.46%4.60%4.62%3.98%1.67%0.79%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGSU.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SGSU.L.

SGSU.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while IGLN.L is Gold. SGSU.L tracks iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGSU.L and 0.12% for IGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGSU.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer