SGSOY vs. CAH
SGSOY (SGS SA) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. SGSOY operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, SGSOY returned 5.45%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for CAH. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGSOY vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGSOY achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 14.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SGSOY has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 5.45%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.
SGSOY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 15.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
CAH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 46.67%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 35.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
SGSOY vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSOY SGS SA | 6.18% | 19.14% | 20.15% | -4.05% | -29.29% | 16.08% | 12.53% | 23.36% | -12.00% | 35.62% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 14.51% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGSOY and CAH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SGSOY and CAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SGSOY:
$23.00B
CAH:
$54.72B
SGSOY:
CHF 0.65
CAH:
$6.57
SGSOY:
14.68
CAH:
35.57
SGSOY:
7.94
CAH:
0.84
SGSOY:
1.33
CAH:
0.22
SGSOY:
CHF 13.71B
CAH:
$250.55B
SGSOY:
CHF 8.66B
CAH:
$9.23B
SGSOY:
CHF 2.70B
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGSOY vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
SGSOY
CAH
SGSOY vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGS SA (SGSOY) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGSOY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.30 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | 6.79 | -4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGSOY vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGSOY drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGSOY and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGSOY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -61.93% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -20.42% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -20.42% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.92% | -22.80% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.92% | -46.13% | +9.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -2.52% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -15.91% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 6.89% | -0.59% |
Volatility
SGSOY vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SGS SA (SGSOY) is 4.97%, while Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that SGSOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGSOY | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 5.59% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.43% | 20.54% | -5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 30.05% | -9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 25.27% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 29.23% | -7.86% |
Dividends
SGSOY vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
SGSOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than CAH's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
SGSOY SGS SA | 3.53% | 3.19% | 3.64% | 3.96% | 3.72% | 2.52% | 1.61% | 1.69% | 2.10% | 4.35% | 5.56% | 2.04% |
Financials
SGSOY vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SGS SA and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGSOY vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
SGSOY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SGS SA reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
SGSOY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SGS SA reported an operating income of 561.32M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
SGSOY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SGS SA reported a net income of 351.08M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGSOY and CAH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAH has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to SGSOY (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGSOY dropped -53.49% vs CAH's -61.93%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGSOY and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer