SGRT vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

SGRT vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SGRT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 48.90%
• 6M: 51.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	1.86%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and GRW is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.30

Return for Risk

SGRT vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGRT	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.63	13.58	-9.95

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRT	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-0.45%	-17.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-0.27%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-0.17%	-2.93%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRT	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.40%	8.89%	+24.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.40%	8.89%	+24.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.40%	8.89%	+24.51%

SGRT vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGRT vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGRT and GRW in my portfolio?

SGRT and GRW have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGRT or GRW?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGRT or GRW?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGRT or GRW?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between SGRT and GRW?

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.75% for GRW.