PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 28.59% return.


SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*

XLE

1D
-1.94%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
28.59%
6M
26.16%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.59%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.59%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and XLE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOVXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+18.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+272.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.05

1.29

+193.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

397.15

3.05

+394.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,450.29

8.57

+4,441.72

SGOV vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.22, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-71.26%

+71.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-12.05%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-20.14%

+20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

-26.04%

+26.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.70%

+8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-17.97%

+17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.29%

-4.29%

Volatility

SGOV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.05%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

7.22%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

16.80%

-16.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

20.60%

-20.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

26.06%

-25.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

29.58%

-29.34%

SGOV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than XLE's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and XLE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 19.94% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 19.94% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.61% for XLE.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XLE is Energy Equities. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.08% for XLE.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.22 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer