PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOL vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOL vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLRE's 9.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed XLRE with an annualized return of 12.74%, while XLRE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.77% annualized return.


SGOL

1D
0.22%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
0.32%
6M
3.15%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
12.74%

XLRE

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
9.85%
6M
9.99%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
6.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOL vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.32%63.99%26.90%12.99%-0.51%-3.94%25.03%18.21%-1.94%12.86%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
9.85%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%-2.39%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and XLRE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOL vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGOLXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.12

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.06

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

2.91

+0.91

SGOL vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGOLXLREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.65

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.15

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.33

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.35

+0.18

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOLXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-38.83%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.02%

-8.33%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-16.74%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-34.12%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

-38.83%

+17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.84%

-1.82%

-18.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-9.60%

-8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.98%

3.03%

+4.95%

Volatility

SGOL vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) at 4.31%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOLXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

4.31%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.24%

10.00%

+13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.58%

13.70%

+12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

19.09%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

20.42%

-4.47%

SGOL vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOL vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.18%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOL and XLRE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGOL has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to XLRE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 12.74% vs 6.77% for XLRE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SGOL.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.

SGOL is categorized as Gold, while XLRE is REIT. SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.13% for XLRE.

SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOL and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer