PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOL vs. VDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOL vs. VDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 35.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 11.62%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


SGOL

1D
0.08%
1M
0.65%
6M
-18.71%
YTD
-6.06%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
11.62%
ALL TIME*
8.34%

VDE

1D
0.04%
1M
10.29%
6M
22.82%
YTD
35.27%
1Y
41.64%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
24.05%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.87M$79.24M$102.39M
$71.54M$103.66M$111.94M

SGOL vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
-6.06%63.99%26.90%12.99%-0.51%-3.94%25.03%18.21%-1.94%12.86%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
35.27%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and VDE is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009

0.11

The correlation between SGOL and VDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOL vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOLVDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.74

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

7.34

-5.62

SGOL vs. VDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the VDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and VDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and VDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOLVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-74.20%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.32%

-15.04%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-21.41%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.32%

-26.58%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.32%

-69.29%

+42.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.94%

-4.29%

-20.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-19.90%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

5.59%

+6.05%

Volatility

SGOL vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 5.13%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOLVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.13%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.69%

16.34%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

20.76%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

26.14%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

29.90%

-13.82%

SGOL vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOL vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison

SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.39%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOL and VDE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGOL has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to VDE (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs VDE's -74.20%.

On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 11.62% vs 9.81% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SGOL.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.

SGOL is categorized as Gold, while VDE is Energy Equities. SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.09% for VDE.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOL and VDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer