PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOL vs. SPIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund (SPIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPIDX's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has underperformed SPIDX with an annualized return of 13.32%, while SPIDX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.33% annualized return.


SGOL

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
2.97%
6M
5.51%
1Y
32.27%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
18.40%
10Y*
13.32%

SPIDX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.78%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
2.97%63.99%26.90%12.99%-0.51%-3.94%25.03%18.21%-1.94%12.86%
SPIDX
Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund
11.58%17.54%24.65%25.95%-18.36%28.30%18.13%31.11%-4.75%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and SPIDX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2009

0.06

The correlation between SGOL and SPIDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOL vs. SPIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIDX
SPIDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund (SPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGOLSPIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.32

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

15.49

-11.29

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SPIDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and SPIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGOLSPIDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.50

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.83

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.47

+0.08

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum SPIDX drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and SPIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOLSPIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-55.30%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

-8.93%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-18.81%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-24.66%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

-33.84%

+12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.72%

0.00%

-17.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-10.51%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

1.91%

+5.80%

Volatility

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund (SPIDX) at 2.82%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOLSPIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

2.82%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.93%

8.99%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

11.89%

+14.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.91%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

18.09%

-2.18%

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGOL vs. SPIDX - Dividend Comparison

SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPIDX
Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund
0.96%1.07%1.28%1.23%1.14%2.09%1.45%2.11%2.82%1.49%1.49%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOL and SPIDX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGOL has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to SPIDX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs SPIDX's -55.30%.

SPIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOL and SPIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer