SGOL vs. OUNZ
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold ETF) are both Gold funds tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), from abrdn and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 11.49%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for OUNZ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OUNZ.
Performance
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGOL having a -6.67% return and OUNZ slightly lower at -6.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGOL having a 11.49% annualized return and OUNZ not far behind at 11.40%.
SGOL
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
OUNZ
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -10.70%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -10.23%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.61%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.67% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF | -6.68% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and OUNZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SGOL and OUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
OUNZ
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 2.20 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and OUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -26.09% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -26.09% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.16% | -26.09% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | -26.09% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.16% | -26.09% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.42% | -25.40% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -7.64% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 9.33% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) have volatilities of 8.65% and 8.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 8.64% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 24.28% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.43% | 27.49% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 18.21% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 16.08% | -0.05% |
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGOL vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGOL nor OUNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SGOL and OUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGOL has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to OUNZ (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs OUNZ's -26.09%.
On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 11.49% vs 11.40% for OUNZ. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OUNZ.
SGOL and OUNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Both ETFs track LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: abrdn and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.25% for OUNZ.
SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and OUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer