SGOL vs. IXC
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 11.62%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for IXC. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
SGOL vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 34.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 11.62%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.11% annualized return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -18.71%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- YTD
- 34.16%
- 1Y
- 42.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.31M | $62.47M | $60.65M | |
| $79.87M | $79.24M | $102.39M |
SGOL vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.06% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 34.16% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and IXC is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SGOL and IXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
IXC
SGOL vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 2.75 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 8.52 | -6.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -67.88% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.32% | -15.36% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -19.06% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.32% | -24.93% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.32% | -64.16% | +37.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.94% | -3.45% | -21.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -17.43% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 4.94% | +6.70% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 5.23%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 5.23% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 15.75% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.79% | 19.35% | +8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 23.35% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 26.81% | -10.73% |
SGOL vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOL vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.83% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOL and IXC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGOL has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to IXC (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 11.62% vs 10.11% for IXC. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.
SGOL is categorized as Gold, while IXC is Energy Equities. SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer