PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOL vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 12.34%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


SGOL

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.15%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
29.18%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*
12.34%

BRK-B

1D
0.71%
1M
1.36%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
0.35%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
-2.39%63.99%26.90%12.99%-0.51%-3.94%25.03%18.21%-1.94%12.86%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.67%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and BRK-B is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOL vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOLBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

-0.02

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

-0.05

+2.90

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOLBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-53.86%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.37%

-9.42%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

-14.95%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

-26.58%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.37%

-29.57%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-9.36%

-12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-11.07%

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

4.53%

+3.93%

Volatility

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that SGOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOLBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

3.95%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.85%

10.78%

+13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.08%

14.38%

+12.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

17.12%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

19.44%

-3.40%

Dividends

SGOL vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGOL nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOL and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGOL has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOL and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer