SGOL vs. AU
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 11.49%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for AU. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SGOL vs. AU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly lower than AU's -4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has underperformed AU with an annualized return of 11.49%, while AU has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
AU
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -4.25%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- 80.24%
- 3Y*
- 57.57%
- 5Y*
- 36.97%
- 10Y*
- 18.48%
SGOL vs. AU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.67% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | -4.25% | 288.18% | 25.43% | -2.68% | -5.09% | -4.87% | 1.90% | 78.89% | 23.96% | -2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and AU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SGOL and AU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. AU — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
AU
SGOL vs. AU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.18 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 5.41 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. AU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum AU drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and AU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -90.12% | +44.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -37.03% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.16% | -37.03% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | -51.75% | +25.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.16% | -67.91% | +41.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.42% | -36.34% | +10.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -46.05% | +27.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 14.88% | -5.54% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. AU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is 8.65%, while AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) has a volatility of 19.34%. This indicates that SGOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | AU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 19.34% | -10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 47.45% | -23.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.43% | 58.91% | -31.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 49.35% | -31.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 49.84% | -33.81% |
Dividends
SGOL vs. AU - Dividend Comparison
SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 5.80% | 2.96% | 1.78% | 1.14% | 2.26% | 2.58% | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.93% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOL and AU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AU has higher volatility (19.34%) compared to SGOL (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs AU's -90.12%.
AU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and AU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer