PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLS.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than PHGP.L's 3.81% return.


SGLS.L

1D
0.62%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
3.01%
6M
5.20%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
17.34%
10Y*

PHGP.L

1D
0.71%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
3.81%
6M
5.28%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
27.79%
5Y*
19.54%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGLS.L
Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
3.01%64.22%24.42%11.48%-1.42%-4.63%-3.17%
PHGP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold
3.81%53.14%27.85%6.97%11.52%-3.11%-8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLS.L and PHGP.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.68

Over the past year, SGLS.L and PHGP.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLS.L
SGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PHGP.L
PHGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGLS.LPHGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.89

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

4.96

-0.48

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLS.L and PHGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGLS.LPHGP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.21

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.66

+0.23

Drawdowns

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.94%, smaller than the maximum PHGP.L drawdown of -42.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLS.L and PHGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLS.LPHGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-42.06%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-17.49%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-17.49%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

-17.49%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.99%

-16.07%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-13.50%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

6.69%

+0.15%

Volatility

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) at 5.10%. This indicates that SGLS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLS.LPHGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

5.10%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.65%

19.93%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.68%

23.05%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.21%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

15.80%

+2.49%

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLS.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than PHGP.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGLS.L vs. PHGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLS.L nor PHGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SGLS.L and PHGP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SGLS.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHGP.L.

SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while PHGP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SGLS.L and 0.39% for PHGP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLS.L and PHGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer