PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHGP.L vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PHGP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold
11.98%53.14%27.85%6.97%11.52%-3.11%19.74%14.47%8.02%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
12.31%52.38%29.13%7.32%11.34%-3.10%21.34%13.68%8.68%
Different Trading Currencies

PHGP.L is traded in GBp, while AAAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAAU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHGP.L having a 11.98% return and AAAU slightly higher at 12.31%.


PHGP.L

1D
2.66%
1M
-9.47%
YTD
11.98%
6M
25.02%
1Y
47.74%
3Y*
30.40%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
14.97%

AAAU

1D
1.54%
1M
-9.63%
YTD
12.31%
6M
25.17%
1Y
48.70%
3Y*
30.80%
5Y*
23.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHGP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PHGP.L vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHGP.L
PHGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHGP.LAAAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

1.91

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.36

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.72

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.43

10.41

+1.02

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHGP.L and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHGP.LAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.91

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.43

1.43

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.19

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between PHGP.L and AAAU is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHGP.L nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHGP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHGP.L and AAAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PHGP.LAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-21.63%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-19.13%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-20.94%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-11.65%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-6.01%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

5.21%

-0.98%

Volatility

PHGP.L vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 10.75%. This indicates that PHGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PHGP.LAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

10.75%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.04%

23.00%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.18%

25.64%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

16.41%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.24%

-0.47%