PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L).
PHGP.L and AIGP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PHGP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Apr 24, 2007. AIGP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Precious Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. Both PHGP.L and AIGP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHGP.L WisdomTree Physical Gold | 11.98% | 53.14% | 27.85% | 6.97% | 11.52% | -3.11% | 19.74% | 14.47% | 4.18% | 1.55% |
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 12.58% | 65.90% | 25.41% | 2.42% | 10.92% | -6.87% | 20.42% | 11.65% | 0.94% | -1.68% |
Different Trading Currencies
PHGP.L is traded in GBp, while AIGP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIGP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHGP.L achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than AIGP.L's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PHGP.L has outperformed AIGP.L with an annualized return of 14.97%, while AIGP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.03% annualized return.
PHGP.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 25.02%
- 1Y
- 47.74%
- 3Y*
- 30.40%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -10.06%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 35.69%
- 1Y
- 62.11%
- 3Y*
- 32.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHGP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PHGP.L
AIGP.L
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHGP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.10 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.50 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.01 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 12.09 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHGP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.10 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.43 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.55 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHGP.L and AIGP.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PHGP.L nor AIGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHGP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, smaller than the maximum AIGP.L drawdown of -51.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHGP.L and AIGP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHGP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.06% | -55.05% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -23.14% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -24.87% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.37% | -27.53% | +5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.47% | -15.84% | +6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.51% | -26.89% | +13.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 6.15% | -1.92% |
Volatility
PHGP.L vs. AIGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Physical Gold (PHGP.L) is 11.35%, while WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that PHGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHGP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.35% | 13.59% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.04% | 27.13% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.18% | 29.42% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 20.72% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 20.04% | -4.27% |