SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE
SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) and SXRW.DE (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLP.L is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while SXRW.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGLP.L returned 13.44%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for SXRW.DE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SXRW.DE.
Performance
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while SXRW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRW.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SXRW.DE's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLP.L has outperformed SXRW.DE with an annualized return of 13.44%, while SXRW.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 28.56%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 19.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
SXRW.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 1.23% | 53.60% | 28.14% | 7.26% | 11.83% | -2.88% | 19.99% | 14.65% | 4.31% | 1.64% |
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 6.73% | 26.91% | 8.62% | 8.25% | 3.93% | 16.00% | -10.65% | 18.67% | -9.35% | 12.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLP.L and SXRW.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, SGLP.L and SXRW.DE have become more correlated (0.22) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGLP.L
SXRW.DE
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLP.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.45 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 8.26 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than SXRW.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and SXRW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLP.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.75% | -34.88% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.82% | -8.89% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | -14.04% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.82% | -14.04% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.82% | -34.88% | +12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.18% | -3.01% | -15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -4.34% | -27.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.44% | 2.64% | +4.80% |
Volatility
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) at 3.25%. This indicates that SGLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLP.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 3.25% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 9.83% | +11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 11.44% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 13.20% | +8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 15.51% | +3.26% |
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRW.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLP.L vs. SXRW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLP.L nor SXRW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLP.L and SXRW.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRW.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLP.L.
SGLP.L is categorized as Gold, while SXRW.DE is Europe Equities. SGLP.L tracks Gold, while SXRW.DE tracks FTSE 100. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLP.L and 0.07% for SXRW.DE.
Find the right allocation for SGLP.L and SXRW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer