PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while DTLA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DTLA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than DTLA.L's -0.35% return.


SGLP.L

1D
2.85%
1M
-9.58%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-1.95%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.00%

DTLA.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.07%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.63%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
-3.19%
5Y*
-5.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SGLP.L
Invesco Physical Gold A
-1.79%53.60%28.14%7.26%11.83%-2.88%19.99%14.65%3.56%
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.35%-2.95%-5.28%-3.39%-22.00%-3.56%13.56%11.29%9.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLP.L and DTLA.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between SGLP.L and DTLA.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLP.L
SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLP.LDTLA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.58

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

1.23

+2.30

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLP.L and DTLA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than DTLA.L's maximum drawdown of -48.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and DTLA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLP.LDTLA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-48.59%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.82%

-8.53%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-17.40%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-39.59%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.62%

-44.48%

+23.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-26.35%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.35%

4.07%

+3.28%

Volatility

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) at 3.16%. This indicates that SGLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLP.LDTLA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

3.16%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.61%

7.46%

+13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

10.43%

+13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

15.83%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

16.15%

+2.61%

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLP.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLP.L nor DTLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLP.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLP.L.

SGLP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. SGLP.L tracks Gold, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLP.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLP.L and DTLA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer