SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L
SGLO.L (iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XGSI.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged) are both Global Bonds funds - SGLO.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while XGSI.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLO.L returned -1.81%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for XGSI.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLO.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XGSI.L.
Performance
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLO.L is traded in GBP, while XGSI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGSI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLO.L achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than XGSI.L's 0.05% return.
SGLO.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -1.34%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.41%
- 5Y*
- -1.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.35%
XGSI.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLO.L iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -0.79% | 0.31% | -1.33% | -1.35% | -7.72% | -5.44% | 5.97% | 2.82% | 5.56% | -2.42% |
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged | 0.05% | -3.42% | 3.01% | 0.55% | -3.00% | -1.56% | 2.75% | 3.35% | 8.32% | -4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLO.L and XGSI.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SGLO.L and XGSI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLO.L
XGSI.L
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGLO.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLO.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 1.15 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLO.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.04 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.06 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLO.L drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, which is greater than XGSI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLO.L and XGSI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLO.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -22.36% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.26% | -6.10% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.41% | -9.18% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.48% | -16.82% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.83% | -17.59% | -5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -12.10% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.65% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGLO.L) is 1.24%, while Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that SGLO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGSI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLO.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.88% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.88% | 5.15% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 6.92% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 9.05% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 9.27% | -0.50% |
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XGSI.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLO.L vs. XGSI.L - Dividend Comparison
SGLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while XGSI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLO.L iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.16% | 3.86% | 3.15% | 1.87% | 0.95% | 0.85% | 1.35% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 0.89% |
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLO.L and XGSI.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLO.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLO.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGSI.L.
SGLO.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XGSI.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGLO.L and 0.25% for XGSI.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLO.L and XGSI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer