PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLD.L is traded in USD, while VWCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLD.L achieves a -6.84% return, which is significantly lower than VWCE.DE's 10.87% return.


SGLD.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-7.14%
6M
-12.96%
YTD
-6.84%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
27.00%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
11.50%

VWCE.DE

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.61%
6M
8.82%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SGLD.L
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
-6.84%64.87%26.23%13.36%-0.08%-4.08%24.18%6.83%
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.87%23.23%17.30%21.91%-18.24%18.47%15.65%7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLD.L and VWCE.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019

0.16

Over the past year, SGLD.L and VWCE.DE have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLD.L
SGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VWCE.DE
VWCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLD.LVWCE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.77

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

11.27

-9.39

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLD.L and VWCE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, which is greater than VWCE.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLD.L and VWCE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLD.LVWCE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-33.91%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.36%

-8.91%

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.36%

-17.27%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-26.11%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.20%

-1.24%

-22.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-5.38%

-12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.07%

2.19%

+7.88%

Volatility

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) at 3.09%. This indicates that SGLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLD.LVWCE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

3.09%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.99%

9.90%

+13.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.39%

12.64%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

15.36%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

17.26%

-1.55%

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VWCE.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLD.L vs. VWCE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLD.L nor VWCE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLD.L and VWCE.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWCE.DE.

SGLD.L is categorized as Gold, while VWCE.DE is Global Equities. SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while VWCE.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLD.L and 0.19% for VWCE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLD.L and VWCE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer