SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L
SGLD.L (Invesco Physical Gold ETC) and GOLB.L (Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - SGLD.L tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM while GOLB.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLD.L returned 17.57%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for GOLB.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOLB.L.
Performance
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLD.L is traded in USD, while GOLB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOLB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLD.L achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly higher than GOLB.L's -7.95% return.
SGLD.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -10.51%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
GOLB.L
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -13.53%
- YTD
- -7.95%
- 6M
- -13.24%
- 1Y
- 54.27%
- 3Y*
- 40.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLD.L Invesco Physical Gold ETC | -6.68% | 64.87% | 26.23% | 13.36% | -0.08% | -4.08% | 19.52% |
GOLB.L Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF | -7.95% | 156.43% | 12.16% | 5.63% | -9.49% | -15.42% | 94.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLD.L and GOLB.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SGLD.L and GOLB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLD.L
GOLB.L
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLD.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.56 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 3.99 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum GOLB.L drawdown of -52.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLD.L and GOLB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLD.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.21% | -52.09% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.36% | -34.63% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.36% | -34.63% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -46.56% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.07% | -33.67% | +9.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -22.39% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 13.57% | -5.21% |
Volatility
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) is 9.09%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that SGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLD.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 17.41% | -8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.04% | 37.55% | -14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 46.16% | -20.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 37.12% | -19.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 45.44% | -29.80% |
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLD.L vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLD.L nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLD.L and GOLB.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOLB.L.
SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while GOLB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLD.L and 0.65% for GOLB.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLD.L and GOLB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer